Some communities do not have enough volunteers. Unfortunately, this is exactly what happens when the government takes money from hard working individuals and redistributes the money to "needy" citizens. The original intent of welfare was to provide a safety net for a small period of time.
Welfare system actually makes poverty more attractive…to those who would otherwise have been motivated to work and support themselves" Westfall 1. Programs that help those that were financially stable and responsible tax payers get through "rough periods".
Not only does dependency create a larger problem in itself, but it siphons money out of the accounts of hard working individuals. For instance, it is encouraged to those who are on welfare checks to not search for jobs because doing that would repeal their benefits.
Mostly by financial counselling and help with mortgage deferments, help selling their home, help downsizing and such until they can can resolve their current financial crisis.
Financial responsibility should be taught in high school. Abuse of Government Welfare Abuse of government welfare can be seen in many different ways even with the current protections in place. Works Cited "Freeloaders 3. This proves to be especially true since many shelters are supported with government funding.
Their desire to work is little to none. Welfare should not be a long term solution for most.
When you see generations of the same family on public assistance their is defiantly a problem to be addressed. Many of these individuals who need help do not contribute even a day in the working class society.
What Does Government Welfare Teach? Another reason, is that these welfare check receivers put everyone else at high risk in the future by draining the limited resources, money, straight into their pockets for doing nothing. Except for those with disabilities it should be a short term "helping hand.
Especially the younger generation. Parents moved in with their children and children moved back home for short periods of time to "get back on their feet".
Therefore, it only makes sense that those who do not contribute should not receive any benefits. Specifically, these so called needy people abuse the system.
These benefits are clearly abused when th e money is not used for the care of the infant.
Submit It needs a drastic over haul. The one thing I would like to see is those who receive monetary assistance those that are capable and fit for work perform community service hours. Families consolidated and and pulled together to help each other out.
Although twenty feet away there is an employment center where jobs are plentiful, even to those without degrees. Over time many depend on government welfare checks and no longer have the will to work.
The horror does not stop there, it continues when mothers become reliant upon government welfare to attain steady income.
The money being generated for social welfare comes directly from those who work hard. To some, this may not annoy them one bit, however, they are clearly not aware of what exactly is happening.
This can have benefits for both parties. It can provide valuable job skills, contacts, and job prospects. Consequently, the money goes directly into the pockets of some stranger who clearly has not earned it. Avoiding bankruptcy and possibly relying on public assistance programs as their situation spirals out of control.
The AEI Press, For example, mothers continue having children out of wedlock to increase the amount of money they receive on welfare checks.
Another reason why government welfare should be eliminated is because the demands placed on the welfare checks are placing a strain on federal programs for the working class.
For these reasons, the government welfare programs need to be eliminated for the present and future. This may sound harsh since the needy are being attacked for their essentials, however, many of these people do not have the desire to work a day in their lives.
Once upon a time when we fell on hard times we turned to our family and our community for help first. They do this by having more children out of wedlock to attain more money in their welfare checks.
Conclusion As one can see, government welfare should be abolished. Because money is a limited resource, it will run out if used improperly.Jesus spoke at length on the relationship of men to God and each other, but largely avoided politics.
He never advocated coercively applying his teachings — that the federal government should force men to love God and their neighbors, as long as the enforcement was efficient, for instance.
But politics drives reform conservatism. To help facilitate this transfer of responsibility from government welfare to private charity, the federal government should offer a dollar-for-dollar tax credit for contributions to private charities that provide social-welfare services.
Do you really want to delete this prezi? Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again. Delete Cancel. Feb 27, · Best Answer: If I were personally to take this angle, I'd argue from the perspective that all forms of government welfare need to go.
Not only for the poor, but also the rich. What the reduction in government expenditures that go into supporting both ends of society could better be fresh-air-purifiers.com: Resolved.
Mar 18, · The issue is "All forms of government welfare should be abolished" For the thesis statement I wrote "All forms of government welfare should not be abolished" But I Status: Resolved.
Government welfare should be reformed, not abolished. I do think that some forms of government welfare should be abolished, but not all of them.
Many forms of government welfare are vital when it comes to the health and well-being of the lower class.Download